by Congress.
#
# The fact that you've confiscated the photos, but still haven't charged
# the photog, seems to indicate you're operating on auto-pilot, and that
# there is nothing wrong with the photos. I've never seen a news report
# where law enforcement wasn't sure, for this particular charge.
#
# It seems that you think some people may have "dirty thoughts" if they
# see the photos; that would make you the "Thought Police"!
#
# Sincerely,
# Guy
----
The New York Times was no help.
They subsequently reviewed his work and called it ~"boring, been there, done
that". As if what they thought of his photos had a damn thing to do with the
matter.
The New York Times then continued to print *** pictures of young girls,
such as on November 10, 1991. They even printed color ***s of young girls
ages 5-8, confident the FBI wasn't going to bust *them*.
How hypocritical and self-serving.
Get a load of this wording:
* "Former Black Panthers Leader Is Freed on Bail"
* By B. Drummond Ayres Jr., The New York Times, June 11, 1997
*
* ...any trial jury is sure to be asked to weigh Mr. Pratt's alleged ***
* excess against the ALLEGED EXCESSES