Man charged in $50,000 coin theft

Man charged in $50,000 coin theft

Post by stone » Thu, 05 Jan 2006 01:56:18



Man charged in theft of $50,000 in coins
Tuesday, January 03, 2006
FROM LOCAL REPORTS

A 28-year-old Muskegon man has been charged with a breaking and
entering last summer that resulted in the theft of nearly $50,000 worth
of coins from a Norton Shores home.

James Edward Eller Jr., of 682 Evanston, faces 60th District Court
preliminary examination Wednesday on charges of first-degree home
invasion and safebreaking.

 Adverti***t

The incident was reported on July 13 in the 2800 block of Huizenga
Street. Police said earlier about 1,000 coins dating from the early
1800s were taken from a bedroom safe that was damaged during the theft.
A large number of uncirculated quarters and buffalo head nickels also
were stolen.

The night of the break-in, Officer Todd S***er went to Meijer Inc. and
obtained a surveillance video of a man who brought a large number of
coins to the store's automated coin-sorter, said Detective Gerald Mack.
The victim identified the man as an acquaintance, he said.

When police examined the coin machine, they found a large number of
uncirculated quarters and buffalo head nickels, Mack said. However, the
old coins have never been recovered.

A warrant for Eller was obtained, but he was never located. Mack said a
Grand Rapids-area police agency recently arrested Eller for breaking
and entering and possession of burglary tools.

Eller was arraigned in Muskegon on the two charges Dec. 21. In addition
to those charges, he faces a third-offense habitual offender count
based on convictions in 1995 for embezzlement and *** to
embezzle, according to his court file.

 
 
 

Man charged in $50,000 coin theft

Post by jim mennin » Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:46:44



Quote:
> FYI, I much prefer when you post the news item itself, rather than
> just a link to it.
> Barry

I appreciate it too, as it avoids having to sign in at so many different sources, but
it is often illegal as it is a copyright infringement.

In another group I frequent, we had a member challenged by an LA Times reporter
(David Colker) for posting the content of an article he authored to our group.

jim menning

 
 
 

Man charged in $50,000 coin theft

Post by Jim Seymou » Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:39:39


Quote:

> FYI, I much prefer when you post the news item itself, rather than
> just a link to it.

That's funny.  I was about to say just the opposite...

Perhaps the link at the top, followed by the text.  (Although, in many
cases, including the text violates copyright)

--
Jim Seymour

 
 
 

Man charged in $50,000 coin theft

Post by Tony Clayto » Thu, 05 Jan 2006 05:02:45



Quote:



> > FYI, I much prefer when you post the news item itself, rather than
> > just a link to it.
> > Barry

> I appreciate it too, as it avoids having to sign in at so many different sources, but
> it is often illegal as it is a copyright infringement.

> In another group I frequent, we had a member challenged by an LA Times reporter
> (David Colker) for posting the content of an article he authored to our group.

Fair enough if he did not give due acknowledgement to the author.

--

Coins of the UK      : http://www.coinsoftheuk.info
Sent using RISCOS on an Acorn Strong Arm RiscPC
... Insanity is just a state of mind.

 
 
 

Man charged in $50,000 coin theft

Post by Jim M » Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:39:50


I suggest they take that individual and put him through the same machine!
Won't say what they should put in it first.
Quote:
> It's bad enough that someone stole this guy's collection.  It's even
> worse that some of it ended up in the Coinstar machine.  Nothing like
> taking beautiful, mint state coins, that have a finite number and
> aren't being produced ever again, and sticking them in Coinstar to be
> trashed and circulated and abused.

> John L.

 
 
 

Man charged in $50,000 coin theft

Post by PC » Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:20:40



Quote:

>> FYI, I much prefer when you post the news item itself, rather than just a
>> link to it.

> That's funny.  I was about to say just the opposite...

> Perhaps the link at the top, followed by the text.  (Although, in many
> cases, including the text violates copyright)

pffft...

A link to the site will generate *some* clicks even if the full text is
here.

A good way to make sure you have all bases covered is to include the most
relevant text and if readers like they can click on the link to get the full
story.  But then that puts more of a burden on stonej.  It's nice of him to
cull these stories off the web and to ask for more is looking a gift horse
in the mouth, IMO.

Me, I prefer link and text and in fact am far less likely to read the story
if I have to click a link and open a web browser.  Not that is really that
difficult on Windows but all the same I am less inclined to actually read a
story when the post only has a link.