Quote:
> I am working on a dual recovery system for a 2.56 airframe. There is not
> enough space to fit 2 front ejection systems side by side. I haven't been
> able to figgure a way to do them one over the other either. So I would like
> to know some more about rear ejection recovery systems. Also my girlfriend's
> son is working on a cone rocket and could use the same information. Any and
> all help would be appreciated. Thanks
Rear ejection tends towards very low reliability. I'd look into electronics,
either a multi function timer, or an Adept altimiter. With electronically
activated ejections (i.e. Robbie Rockets or equivalent), there is no need
for access to the motor compartment. Each recovery system becomes a payload
canister, and can be moved farther forward to improve stability.
For paper/plastic cone rockets like the old centuri point, the flying
saucers, or my happy meal conversions, just eject the motor and the drag
will recover the rest of the model safely.
USPO: HealthCare COMPARE Corp, 5ISD, 3200 Highland Av. Downers Grove, IL 60515
TPC: (708) 241-7919 x5327 ICBM: 4149'48" North 880'51" West
"If you would like to smoke, please feel free to step outside."
PSA flight attendant on route to LA
Disclaimer: If this message is caught or killed, the secretary will disavow
any knowledge of my actions. These bits will self destruct in 5 seconds....