I went to your web site NICE site
your E-Mail is no good the AOL server REJECTS your user name
I would like to know if you have any Rocket/Boost Glider kits ?
President, THE LAUNCH PAD
probably because you made it too big and heavy
Smaller and lighter Mini Engine Powered would work better for a tomohak
remember that is a MISSLE not a plane and it is MADE to go fast by design so
relatively speaking any DESIGN similar will tend to go fast
have you considered That Ultra Light Foam material Estes uses ? it is
EXTREMELY light and would help for slower flights
This 80 mph bird HOW heavy is it ?
How big is it length and Wingspan and wingarea
>>your E-Mail is no good the AOL server REJECTS your user name
>I just checked this. Seems to be working now.
>>I would like to know if you have any Rocket/Boost Glider kits ?
>At the moment, all of our kits are parachute recovery. I did a simulation
>a possible glide-recovery Tomahawk kit, but all the data said it would
>at about 80 MPH. That's a little dangerous for most launch areas around
>I don't want to clip somebody's head off. Thanks for your interest.
>President, THE LAUNCH PAD
> 80 mph
> probably because you made it too big and heavy
> Smaller and lighter Mini Engine Powered would work better for a tomohak
What do you think ?
>The simulation was for a missile based on a 2.6" diameter body tube.
>right about the small wing area needing a really fast glide speed. For now
>project is shelved, unless we decide to do a parachute recovered version.
>What do you think ?
(remove spam food from return address)
1. Launch pad